Sparked by Sidejump's recent blog, and also Sienna's ...
For many of us sex / lovemaking is something we learn from another amateur - usually a juvenile; we have little direct experience to judge anything by, and so we probably spend a lot of time wondering if other people do it better - and for most of us that is in the background for the rest of our sexually active lives - although habit and the familiarity of a long-time partner can make it recede.
Wouldn't it make sense if you couild learn from another well-experienced lover before the bad habits and uncertainties set in?
Shouldn't we therefore encourage generational-gap sex? Rather than looking askance at lovers who have a big age difference, shouldn't we be encouraging a young person to seek coaching from an older one. Of course it would take a few years for the right patterns to evolve - you don't want 35 year old virgins being partnered by 18 year old ones.
We pass on other skills from older to younger - why not the most important one of lovemaking?
you would think her courage failed her wouldnt you? women in their 40s are more compatible(sexually with men in their late teens to early 20s. they are both in their sexual prime the boy learns the man benefits. for younger women with older men? i think for the men, they get a kick out of banging a young thing and possibly for the young thing is the assurance that they dont need to "perform" "keep the man" in case he runs off with their friends, so they can relax and maybe feel like someone cares about them because there isnt competition.
As a 52 year old, I suppose I could be persuaded to join in if forced.
